The Supreme Court on 24th February, 2025, denied bail to a juvenile, stressing that his repeated offences prevent him from avoiding legal consequences simply due to his age. Expressing their ire on the juvenile’s involvement in four identical cases, the bench of Justice J.B. Pardiwala and Justice R. Mahadevan minced no words in calling his behaviour “incorrigible’’ and reinforced their decision to reject his request for bail.

The Court underscored the importance of the juvenile understanding the repercussions of his actions emphasizing that he should not even be treated as a juvenile. The bench strongly objected to his pattern of committing serious crimes, looting people and then taking cover of his juvenile status as a shield. Given the seriousness of the offences, the Court questioned whether he should even be considered a juvenile, as this classification often allows repeat offenders to escape accountability.

The offender is involved in cases of extortion and criminal intimidation and has previously been denied bail by the Rajasthan High Court. However, he remains out on bail in three other cases.

The Apex Court also raised concerns about delays in the trial, noting that the absence of witnesses could affect the petitioner's right to a speedy trial. It emphasized that the presiding officer of the juvenile court must ensure that the prosecution presents its witnesses as required.

Recognizing the need for swift justice, the Court directed that the juvenile’s trial be expedited. It gave the trial court four months to conclude the proceedings and, if necessary, conduct hearings on a day-to-day basis to ensure timely resolution.